Pollard

Fausto Moreno v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20212:20-cv-07705California345 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 FAUSTO MORENO, ) N O . C V 2 0 - 7 7 0 5 - S B ( K S ) 11 Petitioner, )

12 v. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

) 13 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

WARDEN POLLARD,

14 ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. ) 15 _________________________________ ) 16

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United 20 States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, 21 and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court has also reviewed Petitioner’s 22 request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice (Dkt. No. 13), which he filed during the period 23 for—and in lieu of—Objections, and Respondent’s opposition to that request (Dkt. No. 15). 24 Respondent’s position that it would suffer prejudice if Petitioner was allowed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.