William Mendoza v. QVC, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20215:20-cv-01595California2,489 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

JS-6

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 WILLIAM MENDOZA, Case № 5:20-CV-01595-ODW (KKx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

13 v.

COMPEL ARBITRATION [12] AND

14 QVC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DISMISSING ACTION DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 15

Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Before the Court is Defendant QVC, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration 19 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). (Mot., ECF No. 12.) For the following reasons, the Court 20 GRANTS QVC’s Motion.1 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 QVC is a multifaceted television network. (See Decl. of Michelle Zakarian 23 Ex. A (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”), ¶ 14, ECF No. 3; Decl. of Alicia 24 Keane (“Keane Decl.”) ¶ 4, ECF No. 12-3.) QVC employed William Mendoza as a 25 maintenance mechanic from about March 19, 2018, to November 12, 2019. (FAC 26 ¶¶ 15, 21; Keane Decl. ¶ 8.) 27

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.