Caroline Gibson v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20218:20-cv-01232California8,678 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAROLINE GIBSON, Case No. 8:20-cv-01232-JWH-DFMx

ANTHONY POWELL,

12 JAMES KILROY, and

EDWARD BARELA, MEMORANDUM OPINION

13 REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 14 No. 16) v. 15 COUNTY OF ORANGE, a 16 Governmental Entity;

SHERIFF DON BARNES,

17 Individually; DEPUTY THOMAS, Individually; 18 DEPUTY ROBINSON, Individually; DEPUTY T. CARILLO, Individually; 19 and

DOES 1-50,

20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants County of 2 Orange, Sheriff Don Barnes, Deputy Thomas, Deputy Robinson, and Deputy T. 3 Carillo.1 The Court finds that the Motion is appropriate for resolution without a 4 hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in 5 support and in opposition, the Court will GRANT the Motion with leave to 6 amend. 7 I. PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.