Caroline Gibson v. County of Orange
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAROLINE GIBSON, Case No. 8:20-cv-01232-JWH-DFMx
ANTHONY POWELL,
12 JAMES KILROY, and
EDWARD BARELA, MEMORANDUM OPINION
13 REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 14 No. 16) v. 15 COUNTY OF ORANGE, a 16 Governmental Entity;
SHERIFF DON BARNES,
17 Individually; DEPUTY THOMAS, Individually; 18 DEPUTY ROBINSON, Individually; DEPUTY T. CARILLO, Individually; 19 and
DOES 1-50,
20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants County of 2 Orange, Sheriff Don Barnes, Deputy Thomas, Deputy Robinson, and Deputy T. 3 Carillo.1 The Court finds that the Motion is appropriate for resolution without a 4 hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in 5 support and in opposition, the Court will GRANT the Motion with leave to 6 amend. 7 I. PROCEDURAL…