Jorge A. Hernandez v. S. Frauenheom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORGE A. HERNANDEZ, ) NO. CV 19-10892-AB (KS)

11 Petitioner, ) ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) Respondent. ) _________________________________ )

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections (“Objections”). For the reasons below, Petitioner’s Objections are overruled. 24 First, Petitioner objects that he was not afforded adequate translation services during his trial. (Objections at 3.) For the first time in his Objections, Petitioner alleges that the translation services were…