Juan Calderon v. Physicians for Healthy Hospitals, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20215:20-cv-01875California3,640 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN CALDERON, on behalf of all Case No. 5:20-cv-01875-JWH-SPx others similarly aggrieved, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF 13 PLAINTIFF JUAN CALDERON TO v. REMAND [ECF No. 12] 14

PHYSICIANS FOR HEALTHY

15 HOSPITALS, INC., a Delaware corporation; 16 PETER BARONOFF, an individual; and 17 DOES 1 to 50, inclusive,

18 Defendants.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 On August 5, 2020, Plaintiff Juan Calderon, on behalf of all others 3 similarly aggrieved, filed his Complaint for Violation of the Private Attorneys 4 General Act, Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2698 et seq., in Riverside County Superior 5 Court.1 On September 11, 2020, Defendant Physicians for Healthy Hospitals, 6 Inc. (“Physicians”) removed the action to this Court.2 On October 13, 2020, 7 Calderon filed a motion to remand, in which he contends that the Court lacks 8 subject matter jurisdiction.3 For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.