Leemanuel Weilch v. Lexlux Associates, LP

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 LEEMANUEL WEILCH, Case № 2:20-CV-07517-ODW (PDx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

13 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT [17]

14 LEXLUX ASSOCIATES, LP; and DOES 1–10, 15

Defendants. 16

17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilch moves for entry of default judgment against 20 Defendant Lexlux Associates, LP (“Defendant”). (Mot. for Default J. (“Motion” or 21 “Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 17-1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES 22 Weilch’s Motion.1 23 II. BACKGROUND 24 Weilch requires a wheelchair for mobility at all times when traveling in public. 25 (Compl. ¶ 4, ECF No. 1.) He alleges that Defendant is “the real property owner, 26 business operator, lessor and/or lessee, of the real property” for Ramona’s Mexican 27

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D.…