California Capital Insurance Company v. General Electric Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20212:21-cv-00482California522 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-482-MWF (PDx) Date: March 3, 2021 Title: California Capital Insurance Company, et al. v. General Electric Company, et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT [12]

On February 17, 2021, the Court ordered Defendant Target Corporation to show cause why it has complied with or is excused from complying with the rule of unanimity under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A) (the “OSC”). (Docket No. 7). Target filed a response to the OSC on March 1, 2021 (the “Response”). (Docket No. 8). In the Response, Target indicated that is has been unable to obtain the consent of Defendants Jasco Products Company, LLC (“Jasco”) and General Electric Company (“GE”). (Response ¶ 4). In a case involving multiple defendants, “[a]ll defendants must join in a removal petition.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.