ARMLA One, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20212:20-cv-07965California4,466 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12

13 ARMLA ONE, INC., ARMLA TWO, ) Case No.: 2:20-CV-07965-SB-RAO

INC., AND GOMPERS SOCEQ, INC., )

14 ) Assigned to Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. 15 Plaintiffs, ) 16 vs. ) JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) ORDER1 17 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ) 18 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF )

CANNABIS REGULATION, CAT )

19 PACKER, AND DOES 1-100, ) Action Filed: August 31, 2020 20 ) Trial Date: TBD ) 21 Defendants. ) 22 ) 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 5 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 6 the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 7 does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.