ARMLA One, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12
13 ARMLA ONE, INC., ARMLA TWO, ) Case No.: 2:20-CV-07965-SB-RAO
INC., AND GOMPERS SOCEQ, INC., )
14 ) Assigned to Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. 15 Plaintiffs, ) 16 vs. ) JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) ORDER1 17 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ) 18 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF )
CANNABIS REGULATION, CAT )
19 PACKER, AND DOES 1-100, ) Action Filed: August 31, 2020 20 ) Trial Date: TBD ) 21 Defendants. ) 22 ) 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 5 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 6 the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 7 does…