ARMLA One, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20212:20-cv-07965California4,466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMLA ONE, INC., ARMLA TWO, ) Case No.: 2:20-CV-07965-SB-RAO

INC., AND GOMPERS SOCEQ, INC., )

14 ) Assigned to Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) ORDER1 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ) ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF )

CANNABIS REGULATION, CAT )

PACKER, AND DOES 1-100, ) Action Filed: August 31, 2020 ) Trial Date: TBD ) Defendants. ) ) 23 24 25 26 27 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.