Kelly Tiedemann v. Mecta Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20212:21-cv-01594California1,191 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-1594 FMO (JEMx) Date March 15, 2021 Title Kelly Tiedemann v. Mecta Corporation

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff: Attorney Present for Defendant: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action On December 3, 2020, Kelly Tiedemann (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Mecta Corporation (“defendant”), asserting claims relating to a medical device manufactured by defendant. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶¶ 5, 7); (Dkt. 1-1, Complaint). On February 19, 2021, defendant removed the action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (See Dkt. 1, NOR at ¶ 1). Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.