210 Brands Incorporated v. Canterbury of New Zealand Limited

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 210 BRANDS INCORPORATED, a Case No. 2:20-cv-06853-JWH-ASx Nevada corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR v. LACK OF PROSECUTION 14

CANTERBURY OF NEW ZEALAND

15 LIMITED, an English corporation, and 16 PENTLAND GROUP LIMITED, an English corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 On July 30, 2020, Defendant Pentland Group Limited removed this 2 action from the Ventura County Superior Court to this Court.1 On August 6, 3 2020, Pentland Group filed a motion to dismiss.2 The Court granted Pentland 4 Group’s motion on December 29, 2020, dismissing Pentland Group on forum 5 non conveniens grounds.3 The Court also found that service of process on 6 Pentland Group was insufficient, but explained that it would have granted leave 7 to serve Pentland Group properly, had the Court not dismissed Pentland Group 8 on the basis of forum non conveniens. 9 The Court’s order on Pentland Group’s motion to dismiss noted that…