210 Brands Incorporated v. Canterbury of New Zealand Limited
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 210 BRANDS INCORPORATED, a Case No. 2:20-cv-06853-JWH-ASx Nevada corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR v. LACK OF PROSECUTION
CANTERBURY OF NEW ZEALAND
LIMITED, an English corporation, and PENTLAND GROUP LIMITED, an English corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On July 30, 2020, Defendant Pentland Group Limited removed this action from the Ventura County Superior Court to this Court. On August 6, 2020, Pentland Group filed a motion to dismiss. The Court granted Pentland Group’s motion on December 29, 2020, dismissing Pentland Group on forum non conveniens grounds. The Court also found that service of process on Pentland Group was insufficient, but explained that it would have granted leave to serve Pentland Group properly, had the Court not dismissed Pentland Group on the basis of forum non conveniens. The Court’s order on Pentland Group’s motion to dismiss noted that…