Haiyan Zhao v. Raymond Grant Parkman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAIYAN ZHAO, Case No. 5:21-cv-00187-JWH-SPx
Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING CASE
v.
RAYMOND GRANT PARKMAN,
Defendant.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On February 1, 2021, Raymond Grant Parkman removed this action to 2|| this Court.’ The Court sua sponte reviews its own subject matter jurisdiction. 3|| Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (courts “have an independent 4|| obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the 5|| absence of a challenge from any party”). Parkman asserts that the Court has 6 || subject matter jurisdiction based upon federal question jurisdiction and diversity || jurisdiction.” This case involves claims for alleged damages relating to the management 9|| of rental property. The civil case cover sheet lists the causes of action as breach 10 || of contract, unlawful conversion, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of 11|| …