Haiyan Zhao v. Raymond Grant Parkman

1 JS -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HAIYAN ZHAO, Case No. 5:21-cv-00187-JWH-SPx

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING CASE

13 v.

14 RAYMOND GRANT PARKMAN,

15 Defendant.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 On February 1, 2021, Raymond Grant Parkman removed this action to 2|| this Court.’ The Court sua sponte reviews its own subject matter jurisdiction. 3|| Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (courts “have an independent 4|| obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the 5|| absence of a challenge from any party”). Parkman asserts that the Court has 6 || subject matter jurisdiction based upon federal question jurisdiction and diversity || jurisdiction.” 8 This case involves claims for alleged damages relating to the management 9|| of rental property. The civil case cover sheet lists the causes of action as breach 10 || of contract, unlawful conversion, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of 11|| …