Dean Rollolazo v. BMW of North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20218:16-cv-00966California1,799 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nited States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 Western Dibision 11 121 BARRY BRAVERMAN, et al., SA CV 16-00966 TJH 13 Plaintiffs, @Mrver 14 v. any 15 | BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Jusgment 16 Defendant. JS-6 17 18 19 The Court has considered the cross motions for summary judgment, and 20 || Plaintiffs’ motion for an order approving the form and manner of the Class Notice, 21 || together with the moving and opposing papers. 22 On May 26, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action against Defendant 23 || BMW of North America, LLC’s [*BMW”] alleging that its model years 2014 to 2016 24 || 13 Rex electric car equipped with the “Range Extender” option [“Class Car”] contains 25 || a design defect which, inter alia, causes the Class Car to suddenly decelerate when its 26 || battery’s charge drops to a certain level, and that BMW hid …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.