Dean Rollolazo v. BMW of North America, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
nited States District Court Central District of California Western Dibision 11 121 BARRY BRAVERMAN, et al., SA CV 16-00966 TJH Plaintiffs, @Mrver v. any BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Jusgment Defendant. JS-6 17 18 The Court has considered the cross motions for summary judgment, and 20 || Plaintiffs’ motion for an order approving the form and manner of the Class Notice, 21 || together with the moving and opposing papers. On May 26, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action against Defendant 23 || BMW of North America, LLC’s [*BMW”] alleging that its model years 2014 to 2016 24 || 13 Rex electric car equipped with the “Range Extender” option [“Class Car”] contains 25 || a design defect which, inter alia, causes the Class Car to suddenly decelerate when its 26 || battery’s charge drops to a certain level, and that BMW hid …