Dean Rollolazo v. BMW of North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20218:16-cv-00966California1,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

nited States District Court Central District of California Western Dibision 11 121 BARRY BRAVERMAN, et al., SA CV 16-00966 TJH Plaintiffs, @Mrver v. any BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Jusgment Defendant. JS-6 17 18 The Court has considered the cross motions for summary judgment, and 20 || Plaintiffs’ motion for an order approving the form and manner of the Class Notice, 21 || together with the moving and opposing papers. On May 26, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action against Defendant 23 || BMW of North America, LLC’s [*BMW”] alleging that its model years 2014 to 2016 24 || 13 Rex electric car equipped with the “Range Extender” option [“Class Car”] contains 25 || a design defect which, inter alia, causes the Class Car to suddenly decelerate when its 26 || battery’s charge drops to a certain level, and that BMW hid …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.