Kerry Moriarty v. Integon National Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20212:19-cv-03619California2,746 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 KERRY MORIARTY, Case № 2:19-cv-03619-ODW (RAOx)

12 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [35]

14 INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

15 Defendant and Counter-Claimant, 16 v. 17

18 SERVIS ONE, INC. DBA BSI

FINANCIAL SERVICES,

19 Counter-Defendant. 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 On September 27, 2017, Defendant/Counter-Claimant Integon National 23 Insurance Company’s (“Integon”) issued a flood insurance policy (the “Policy”) to 24 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Kerry Moriarty and Counter-Defendant Servis One, Inc. 25 dba BSI Financial Services (“BSI”). (Def.’s Separate Statement of Uncontroverted 26 Facts (“DSUF”) 2, ECF No. 35-2; Pl.’s Statement of Genuine Issues of Material Fact 27 (“PSF”) 2, ECF No. 38-1.) After Integon denied a claim by Moriarty for coverage 28 under the Policy, Moriarty initiated this action against Integon asserting two causes of 1 action for (1) breach of contract based on the Policy, and (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.