Steven Hunter v. Felipie Martinez, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20212:20-cv-11289California1,652 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11

STEVEN HUNTER,

Case No. 2:20-cv-11289-JAK (SHK) 12 Plaintiff,

13

14 v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

15 FELIPE MARTINEZ, JR., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff Steven Hunter (“Plaintiff”), an inmate 21 housed at United States Penitentiary (“USP”) Victorville, proceeding pro se, 22 constructively filed1 a “‘Emergency’ 42 USC 1983 Complaint” (“Complaint” or 23 “Compl.”) against Defendants Felipe Martinez, Jr.; “Dr. Doorman, Chief 24 Psychology”; “Dr. Dorsey, Psychology”; “Dr. McGlee, Psychology”; “Dr. Yeh, 25 Psychology”; “Dr. Espero, Medical Doctor”; “SSI Lt. Varcedo”; “Lt. Hassly, SHU Lt.”; 26

27 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to 1 and “Lopez” (collectively “Defendants”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). 2 Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. (capitalization normalized). 3 On December 14, 2020, the case was filed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.