Steven Hunter v. Felipie Martinez, Jr.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3
4
5
6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11
STEVEN HUNTER,
Case No. 2:20-cv-11289-JAK (SHK) 12 Plaintiff,
13
14 v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
15 FELIPE MARTINEZ, JR., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff Steven Hunter (“Plaintiff”), an inmate 21 housed at United States Penitentiary (“USP”) Victorville, proceeding pro se, 22 constructively filed1 a “‘Emergency’ 42 USC 1983 Complaint” (“Complaint” or 23 “Compl.”) against Defendants Felipe Martinez, Jr.; “Dr. Doorman, Chief 24 Psychology”; “Dr. Dorsey, Psychology”; “Dr. McGlee, Psychology”; “Dr. Yeh, 25 Psychology”; “Dr. Espero, Medical Doctor”; “SSI Lt. Varcedo”; “Lt. Hassly, SHU Lt.”; 26
27 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to 1 and “Lopez” (collectively “Defendants”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). 2 Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. (capitalization normalized). 3 On December 14, 2020, the case was filed on…