Gissel Castano Diaz v. County of Santa Barbara

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20212:20-cv-11335California330 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: CV 20-11335-AB (JPRx) Date: March 18, 2021

Title: | Gissel Castano Diaz v. County of Santa Barbara et al

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 8, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.