Van Keyshone Rollen v. M. E. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VAN KEYSHONE ROLLEN, Case No. 5:18-cv-01042-RGK-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

M.E. SPEARMAN, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition (“SAP”), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on February 22, 2021 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 71.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. First, Petitioner asserts that the Report and Recommendation “assumes facts not in evidence,” misrepresents or misquotes evidence, and “calls for speculation.” (Id. at 1.) However, Petitioner…