Michael Parks v. Patrick Eaton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL PARKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-03267-JLS (AFM) Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PATRICK EATON, Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Petitioner’s objections are overruled. With the exception of the following, Petitioner’s objections do not warrant discussion as they are properly addressed in the Report. Petitioner complains that the Report fails to address his allegation that the trial court did not obtain a written waiver of his right to be present at his trial as required by California law. (ECF No. 20 at 1-2.) To begin with, Petitioner’s assertion is factually…