Michael Parks v. Patrick Eaton

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL PARKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-03267-JLS (AFM) 12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

13 v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 14 PATRICK EATON, Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on 18 file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 19 (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 20 the Report to which objections have been made. 21 Petitioner’s objections are overruled. With the exception of the following, 22 Petitioner’s objections do not warrant discussion as they are properly addressed in 23 the Report. 24 Petitioner complains that the Report fails to address his allegation that the trial 25 court did not obtain a written waiver of his right to be present at his trial as required 26 by California law. (ECF No. 20 at 1-2.) To begin with, Petitioner’s assertion is 27 factually…