Mario U. Grassano v. The Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO U. GRASSANO, Case No. 2:20-cv-06903-SVW-AFM 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING THE
13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14
THE LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR
15 THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY
TO ANIMALS ET AL.,
16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on July 31, 2020, 19 against defendants the Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 20 (“SPCALA”) and the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority (“SEAACA”). (ECF 21 No. 1.) On September 18, 2020, defendant SPCALA filed its Answer. (ECF No. 22 18.) On September 23, 2020, defendant SEAACA filed a Motion to Dismiss. (ECF 23 No. 20.) Plaintiff failed to timely file his opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (or 24 seek an extension of time in which to do so), and the Court issued an Order to Show 25 Cause in writing as to why the action should not be dismissed as to defendant the 26 SEAACA. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff subsequently stated under penalty…