Juan Dionicio Castro v. J. Robertson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN DIONICIO CASTRO, Case No. 8:18-cv-00867-DMG-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT 13 v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

14 J. ROBERTSON, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), the other records on file 19 herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 20 The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and 21 Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on November 12, 2020 22 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 21.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the 24 Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. 25 Petitioner objects to portions of the factual summary in the Report and 26 Recommendation. (Objs. 2–7; see Rep. & Recommendation, ECF No. 19, at 3–10.)…