Juan Dionicio Castro v. J. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20218:18-cv-00867California434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN DIONICIO CASTRO, Case No. 8:18-cv-00867-DMG-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

J. ROBERTSON, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on November 12, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 21.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. Petitioner objects to portions of the factual summary in the Report and Recommendation. (Objs. 2–7; see Rep. & Recommendation, ECF No. 19, at 3–10.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.