Hannah Leigh Jones v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20212:19-cv-08183California10,720 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HANNAH LEIGH J.,1 ) Case No. CV 19-8183-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 I. PROCEEDINGS 18 Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision 19 denying her application for Social Security supplemental security 20 income benefits (“SSI”). The matter is before the Court on the 21 parties’ Joint Stipulation, filed August 31, 2020, which the 22 Court has taken under submission without oral argument. For the 23 reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed. 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in line with 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 28 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiff was born in 1997. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 3 161.) She completed high school and worked part time as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.