Rosalinda Higdon v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20218:19-cv-01622California5,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSALINDA H., ) Case No. SACV 19-1622-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) REVERSING COMMISSIONER 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) I. PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her applications for Social Security disability income benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation, filed May 12, 2020, which the Court has taken under submission without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this action is 26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in line with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. remanded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.