Alberto Casillas v. George Jaime

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:20-cv-02167California9,166 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ) ALBERTO CASILLAS, ) Case No. CV 20-2167-JEM 12 ) Petitioner, ) 13 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER v. ) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF 14 ) HABEAS CORPUS AND DENYING GEORGE JAIME, et al., ) CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 15 ) Respondents. ) 16 ) 17

PROCEEDINGS

18 On March 5, 2020, Alberto Casillas (“Petitioner”), a prisoner in state custody, filed a 19 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 (“Petition”). On July 20 9, 2020, Warden Jaime (“Respondent”) filed an Answer. On October 21, 2020, Petitioner 21 filed a Reply. 22 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties have consented to proceed before this 23 Magistrate Judge. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 2 On August 31, 2017, a Los Angeles County Superior Court jury found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.