Roger Feldman v. Discover Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20212:21-cv-01670California733 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-1670-DMG (RAOx) Date March 29, 2021

Title Roger Feldman dba Aliga Online v. Discover Bank, et al. Page 1 of 2

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [10]

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Remand (“MTR”) filed by Plaintiff Roger Feldman dba Aliga Online. [Doc. # 10.]

In his motion, Feldman argues that Defendant Discover Bank failed to adequately allege this Court’s diversity jurisdiction in its Notice of Removal. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1332, a district court shall have jurisdiction over a civil action where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000 and there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. A civil action brought in a state court over which a federal district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.