St. Michael Balzarini v. R. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20215:21-cv-00482California1,398 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ST. MICHAEL BALZARINI, Case No. 5:21-cv-00482-RGK-MAA

12 Petitioner,

ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING

13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 14

R. BROOMFIELD,

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 On March 14, 2021, Petitioner St. Michael Balzarini, acting pro se, filed a 19 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) 20 (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) As discussed below, summary dismissal of the 21 action is appropriate. 22 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in 1995 in the San Bernardino 25 County Superior Court. (See Pet. 2.) This is Petitioner’s fifth federal habeas action 26 in this District predicated on the 1995 conviction. The Court takes judicial notice of 27 Petitioner’s prior habeas cases in this District. See Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(2) (“The 28 court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because 1 it . . . can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot 2 reasonably be questioned.”);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.