Darlene Yvette Cortez v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20215:20-cv-00060California3,330 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DARLENE YVETTE C., an Individual, Case No.: 5:20-00060 ADS

12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Darlene Yvette C.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial 20 of her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and 21 social security income (SSI). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge 22

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 (“ALJ”) improperly considered the opinions of the examining and reviewing physicians. 2 For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this 3 matter is dismissed with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.