Carrie Beatrice Nash v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20215:19-cv-02129California5,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARRIE N., ) Case No. ED CV 19-2129-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 I. INTRODUCTION On November 6, 2019, plaintiff Carrie N. filed a complaint against defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking review of a denial of a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The parties have fully briefed the issues in dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. Plaintiff presents two disputed issues for decision: (1) whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to properly consider the evidence in the record in assessing plaintiff’s residual functional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.