1661 Inc. v. Clear Sky Assets, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20212:20-cv-01144California1,013 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

JS-6

oe

4 Ns CW__ □□□□□ 6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | 1661 INC. D/B/A GOAT, Case No. 2:20-cv-01144-CJC-RAO 12 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT 3 INJUNCTION

14 | CLEAR SKY ASSETS INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 | IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 18 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 19 Plaintiff 1661 Inc. dba GOAT (“GOAT”) has alleged and Defendant Clear 20 || Sky Assets Inc., (“Clear Sky”) has stipulated to and does not contest the following: 21 l. GOAT is the owner of the following United States Trademark 22 || Registrations for the GOAT trademark (as shown below), and it has acquired 23 || substantial common law trademark rights in the GOAT marks and related logos 24 || (collectively, the “GOAT Marks’): 25 26 27 28

! feowr |e eosin [Meh □□□ 8 2. Since its launch in 2018, Clear Sky has used the “GOAT”, 9 | “GREATEST OF ALL TIME”, “GOAT SHIELD”,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.