Marcelino Prado v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20212:20-cv-05341California2,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELINO P., Case No. 2:20-cv-05341-GJS

Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v. ORDER

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Marcelino P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 16 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), Dkt. 17 (“Def.’s Br.”), and Dkt. 18 (Pltf.’s Reply”).] The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be affirmed. 26 27 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.