Victor Armando Rubio-Herrera v. T. Justino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20212:21-cv-02364California549 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:21-cv-02364-MWF (SK) Date April 2, 2021 Title Victor Armando Rubio-Herrera v. T. Jusino

Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Petitioner is a federal prisoner challenging the loss of 27 days of good-time credit after a prison disciplinary proceeding. (ECF 1). He alleges that his due process rights were violated in various ways and so is entitled to the restoration of those 27 days under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. According to public inmate records, Petitioner is scheduled to be released in June 2021. His petition is subject to dismissal, however, for two reasons. First, he has not shown that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. See Ward v. Chavez, 678 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir. 2012). The BOP has administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.