Kevin Morgan v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20215:20-cv-01003California1,552 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

In 2016, Kevin M. (“Plaintiff”) applied for Supplemental Security Income, alleging disability beginning January 1, 2008. See Dkt. 16, Administrative Record (“AR”) 172-82.1 After the claim was denied initially and on reconsideration, Plaintiff requested and received a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). See AR 29-45, 104-08, 112-16.

1 The Court partially redacts Plaintiff’s name in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States.

Additionally, all citations to the AR are to the record pagination. All other docket citations are to the CM/ECF pagination. The ALJ denied Plaintiffs claim by written decision on June 26, 2019. See AR 15-24. The ALJ followed the five-step sequential evaluation process for determining whether an individual is disabled. At step one, the ALJ found that Plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since his application date. See AR 17. At step two, the ALJ determined that Plaintiff had the severe impairments of “bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and lumbar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.