Rosa Lilian Padilla Ayala v. Teledyne Defense Electronics

1

JS-6

2

3 4 5 6

7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. 2:21-CV-01322-AB-MRW ROSA LILIAN PADILLA AYALA, an 13

14 individual,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

15 REMAND 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 TELEDYNE DEFENSE 20 ELECTRONICS, D/B/A TELEDYNE RELAYS, a Delaware limited liability 21 company; VERONICA CLAXON, an 22 individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 Before the Court is Plaintiff Rosa Lilian Padilla Ayala’s Motion to Remand. 28 (“Plaintiff,” “Motion,” Dkt. No. 10.) Defendant Teledyne Defense Electronics, doing 1 business as Teledyne Relays (“Defendant,” or “Teledyne”), opposed (“Opp’n,” Dkt. 2 No. 14), and Plaintiff replied (“Reply,” Dkt. No. 15.) The Court deemed the matter 3 appropriate for decision without oral argument and vacated the hearing scheduled for 4 April 9, 2021. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; LR 7-15. For the following reasons, the Court 5 GRANTS the Motion. 6 I. BACKGROUND 7 a. Factual Background 8 The following allegations are taken from the Plaintiff’s Complaint filed…