Rosa Lilian Padilla Ayala v. Teledyne Defense Electronics

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20212:21-cv-01322California3,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

3 4 5

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No. 2:21-CV-01322-AB-MRW ROSA LILIAN PADILLA AYALA, an

individual,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

REMAND 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 TELEDYNE DEFENSE ELECTRONICS, D/B/A TELEDYNE RELAYS, a Delaware limited liability company; VERONICA CLAXON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 Before the Court is Plaintiff Rosa Lilian Padilla Ayala’s Motion to Remand. (“Plaintiff,” “Motion,” Dkt. No. 10.) Defendant Teledyne Defense Electronics, doing business as Teledyne Relays (“Defendant,” or “Teledyne”), opposed (“Opp’n,” Dkt. No. 14), and Plaintiff replied (“Reply,” Dkt. No. 15.) The Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument and vacated the hearing scheduled for April 9, 2021. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; LR 7-15. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND a. Factual Background The following allegations are taken from the Plaintiff’s Complaint filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.