Dong Su v. Henry Global Consulting Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20212:20-cv-02235California1,922 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 11

22

33

44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 DONG SU, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-02235-ODW (PLAx)

1122 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

1133 v. DISMISS [9]

1144 HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING GROUP, et al., 1155 Defendants. 1166

1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 On March 6, 2020, Plaintiffs1 initiated this putative class action against 2200 Defendants Henry Global Consulting Group (“Global”); Goldstone Advisors, Ltd.; 2211 and Henry Tongzhao USA Consulting, Inc., erroneously sued as Tongzhao USA 2222 Consulting, Inc. (“Tongzhao”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs allege they hired 2233 Global to act as their immigration agent, and Global failed to disclose a “finder’s fee” 2244 that it earned for referring Plaintiffs to investment projects in the United States. (Id. 2255 ¶¶ 15–20.) Plaintiffs assert one cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty against 2266 Defendants based on Global’s alleged failure to disclose the “finder’s fee.” (See 2277

2288 1 The named Plaintiffs are Dong Su, Jranyi Zeng,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.