Dong Su v. Henry Global Consulting Group
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 11
22
33
44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 DONG SU, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-02235-ODW (PLAx)
1122 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
1133 v. DISMISS [9]
1144 HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING GROUP, et al., 1155 Defendants. 1166
1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 On March 6, 2020, Plaintiffs1 initiated this putative class action against 2200 Defendants Henry Global Consulting Group (“Global”); Goldstone Advisors, Ltd.; 2211 and Henry Tongzhao USA Consulting, Inc., erroneously sued as Tongzhao USA 2222 Consulting, Inc. (“Tongzhao”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs allege they hired 2233 Global to act as their immigration agent, and Global failed to disclose a “finder’s fee” 2244 that it earned for referring Plaintiffs to investment projects in the United States. (Id. 2255 ¶¶ 15–20.) Plaintiffs assert one cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty against 2266 Defendants based on Global’s alleged failure to disclose the “finder’s fee.” (See 2277
2288 1 The named Plaintiffs are Dong Su, Jranyi Zeng,…