Kyle Roberts v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
BACKGROUND
24 On October 13, 2016, Plaintiff applied for supplemental security income,
Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 27 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 28 alleging disability since July 1, 2015. Plaintiff’s application was denied. (Administrative Record [“AR”] 88-94.) A hearing took place on April 23, 2019 before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). Plaintiff, who was represented by counsel, and a vocational expert (“VE”) testified at the hearing. (AR 51-75.) In a decision dated May 2, 2019, the ALJ found that Plaintiff suffered from the severe impairment of degenerative disc disease. (AR 41.) After finding that Plaintiff’s impairment did not meet or equal a listed impairment, the ALJ determined that Plaintiff retained the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform a light work with the restriction to frequent pushing or pulling with the lower extremities and occasional postural activities. (AR 42.) Relying on the…