California Capital Insurance Company v. Enstar Holdings US LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 11
22
33
44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE Case No. 2:20-cv-07806-ODW (JPRx) COMPANY, et al., 1122 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 1133 MOTION TO DISMISS [20] v. 1144 ENSTAR HOLDINGS (US) LLC, et al., 1155 Defendants. 1166
1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 Plaintiffs California Capital Insurance Company, Eagle West Insurance 2200 Company, Monterey Insurance Company, and Nevada Capital Insurance Company 2211 allege that in 2012 they entered into a reinsurance agreement (the “Treaty”) with 2222 non-party Maiden Reinsurance North America, Inc. (“Maiden”). (Notice of Removal, 2233 Ex. 2 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), ECF No. 1-2.) Plaintiffs allege that Defendants 2244 Enstar Holdings US LLC (“Enstar Holdings”), Enstar US Inc. (d/b/a Enstar 2255 Administrators), Cranmore US Inc., and Enstar Group Ltd. acquired Maiden in 2018 2266 and thereafter directed Maiden to breach its obligations under the Treaty. (See 2277 generally Compl.) …