Kinsley Technology Co. v. Ya Ya Creations, Inc.

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 KINSLEY TECHNOLOGY CO., Case № 2:20-cv-04310-ODW (KSx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

13 v.

LESKRO, INC.’S MOTION TO

14 YA YA CREATIONS, INC., et al., DISMISS [100]

15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Kinsley Technology Co. (“Kinsley”) filed this trademark infringement 19 action against several defendants, including Defendant Leskro, Inc. dba Orksel, Inc. 20 (“Leskro”). (See First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 31.) Now, Leskro moves to 21 dismiss the claims asserted against it pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22 (“Rules”) 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 100.) 23 The Motion is fully briefed. (Id.; Opp’n, ECF No. 114; Reply, ECF No. 117.) For the 24 following reasons, the Motion is DENIED.1 25 26 27

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 II.…