Jack Gershfeld v. Teamviewer US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20218:21-cv-00058California1,222 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 FILED

2 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA —_CW □□□□□ 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 11 || JACK GERSHFIELD, on behalf of Case No.: SACV 21-00058-CJC (ADSx) himself and all other similarly situated individuals, 13 14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. 23] 15 V. '° | TEAMVIEWER US, INC., and DOES 17 || 1-100, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 || I. INTRODUCTION 24 25 Plaintiff Jack Gershfield brings this putative class action against Defendant 26 || Teamviewer US, Inc. and unnamed Does, alleging violations of California’s Unfair 27 || Competition Law (“UCL”) and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). (Dkt. 20 28 [First Amended Complaint, hereinafter “FAC’’]; Dkt. 1-1 at 5 [Complaint, hereinafter

1 “Compl.”].) Plaintiff initially filed his claims in state court but Defendant removed the 2 case, asserting jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.