Jack Gershfeld v. Teamviewer US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20218:21-cv-00058California1,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILED

2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA —_CW □□□□□ 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 || JACK GERSHFIELD, on behalf of Case No.: SACV 21-00058-CJC (ADSx) himself and all other similarly situated individuals, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. 23] V. '° TEAMVIEWER US, INC., and DOES 17 || 1-100, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 || I. INTRODUCTION 24 Plaintiff Jack Gershfield brings this putative class action against Defendant 26 || Teamviewer US, Inc. and unnamed Does, alleging violations of California’s Unfair 27 || Competition Law (“UCL”) and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). (Dkt. 20 [First Amended Complaint, hereinafter “FAC’’]; Dkt. 1-1 at 5 [Complaint, hereinafter

“Compl.”].) Plaintiff initially filed his claims in state court but Defendant removed the case, asserting jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.