William Kissas v. Mackenzie Johnson
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
11 WILLIAM KISSAS p/k/a/ “WILL K”, Case No. 2:20-cv-04534-RGK-JEM 12 Plaintiff, [Hon. R. Gary Klausner] 13 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 14 ORDER MACKENZIE JOHNSON p/k/a 15 “MAKJ”, an individual, TINASHE [Discovery Document: Referred to JORGENSEN KACHINGWE p/k/a Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott] 16 “TINASHE”, an individual, TINASHE MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, Trial Date: August 24, 2021 17 CONNOR MCDONOUGH, an individual, RILEY MCDONOUGH, an 18 individual, and MAX LEVIN, an individual, 19 Defendants. 20
21
22 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve the production of confidential, 3 proprietary, private, or trade secret information for which special protection from 4 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 5 is warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties…