William Kissas v. Mackenzie Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20212:20-cv-04534California4,640 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

10

11 WILLIAM KISSAS p/k/a/ “WILL K”, Case No. 2:20-cv-04534-RGK-JEM 12 Plaintiff, [Hon. R. Gary Klausner] 13 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 14 ORDER MACKENZIE JOHNSON p/k/a 15 “MAKJ”, an individual, TINASHE [Discovery Document: Referred to JORGENSEN KACHINGWE p/k/a Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott] 16 “TINASHE”, an individual, TINASHE MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, Trial Date: August 24, 2021 17 CONNOR MCDONOUGH, an individual, RILEY MCDONOUGH, an 18 individual, and MAX LEVIN, an individual, 19 Defendants. 20

21

22 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve the production of confidential, 3 proprietary, private, or trade secret information for which special protection from 4 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 5 is warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.