John C. Young v. Los Angeles Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20212:20-cv-11087California3,770 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

19 Plaintiff John C. Young (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 20 filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) for violations of his 21 Fourth Amendment rights. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the 22 Complaint with leave to amend. 23

II.

24

ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT

25 On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff constructively filed1 a Complaint against the 26 Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”), the County of Los Angeles, Sergeant 27 1 Smith, and various “John Doe” defendants in their individual and official capacities. 2 ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. 3 On February 2, 2021, prior to the Court screening the Complaint, Plaintiff 4 constructively filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against the LAPD, “John 5 Does 1-10,” and five LAPD employees in their individual capacity: Officer Grant, 6 Officer Lopez, Officer Arnendariz, Officer Dzwoniarek, and Sergeant Smith 7 (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. 8, FAC at 3-4. The FAC alleges Defendants 8 subjected Plaintiff to a “warrantless arrest and subsequent malicious prosecution” in 9 violation of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 5. Specifically, the FAC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.