Stephanie Ilene Lazarus v. Molly Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHANIE ILENE LAZARUS, Case No. 5:18-cv-00718-VBF-MAA
12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
MOLLY HILL, Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which Petitioner filed on January 8, 2021 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 22.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. First, Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge’s determination that the California Court of Appeal’s February 8, 2018 order denying habeas relief, rather than the Los Angeles Superior Court’s October 20, 2017 decision, was the last 27…