Chase Daniel Daugherty v. James R. Hefflin
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 / REMAND
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. ED CV 21-373-DMG (SHKx) Date April 23, 2021
Title Chase Daniel Daugherty v. James R. Hefflin Page 1 of 2
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
On March 2, 2021, Defendant James Hefflin filed a Notice of Removal purporting to remove a Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order in Riverside County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Chase Daniel Daugherty. [Doc. # 1.] Hefflin asserts that the Court has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
The document attached to Defendant’s Notice of Removal is a state court order on request to continue hearing, not a complaint or case-initiating document. It is obvious that this Court does not have “original jurisdiction” over a state-court scheduling order. …