Luis Villegas v. Heavenly Mountain, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:18-cv-06716California3,173 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 LUIS VILLEGAS, Case № 2:18-cv-06716-ODW (PLAx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

13 v. STARBUCKS’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT [46] AND

14 HEAVENLY MOUNTAIN, LLC, a DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION California Limited Liability Company; 15 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY Washington Corporation; and Does 1-10, JUDGMENT [47] 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Luis Villegas alleges the sales counter, bathroom mirror, and parking 21 area at Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s coffee shop violate the Americans with 22 Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“UCRA”). (Compl. ¶¶ 11– 23 31, ECF No. 1.) Starbucks moves for summary judgment, and Villegas moves for 24 partial summary judgment against Starbucks.1 (Starbucks Mot., ECF No. 46; Villegas 25 Mot., ECF No. 47.) The Motions are fully briefed. (See Opp’n Villegas Mot., ECF 26

27 1 Villegas also brought this action against Starbucks’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.