Dwain Lammey v. Starbucks Corporation

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 DWAIN LAMMEY, Case № 2:18-cv-10017-ODW (GJSx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT [39] AND

14 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Washington Corporation; and Does 1-10, 15 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [41] Defendants, 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Dwain Lammey alleges the sales counter at Defendant Starbucks 20 Corporation’s coffee shop violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and 21 the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“UCRA”). (Compl. ¶¶ 21–31, ECF No. 1.) Both parties 22 move for summary judgment. (Starbucks Mot., ECF No. 39; Lammey Mot., ECF 23 No. 41.) The Motions are fully briefed. (See Opp’n Lammey Mot., ECF No. 46; Opp’n 24 Starbucks Mot., ECF No. 48; Reply Starbucks Mot., ECF No. 50; Reply Lammey Mot., 25 ECF No. 51.) For the following reasons, Starbucks’s Motion is GRANTED, and 26 Lammey’s Motion is DENIED.1 27

28 1 After…