Jane D.M. Doe v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-03218California1,350 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE D.M. DOE, a minor, by and ) Case No. 20-cv-3218 DDP (JPRx) 10 through her Guardian ad Litem, Ivette ) 11 Rodriguez, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 12 ) MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND Plaintiff, ) AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR 13 ) DAMAGES 14 v. ) ) [Dkt. 37] 15 )

16 ) ) 17 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and ) 18 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) 19 Defendants. ) 20 ) ) 21

22 Presently before the court is County of Los Angeles’ Motion to Dismiss Second

23 Amended Complaint for Damages. (Dkt. 37, Mot.) Having considered the submissions

24 of the parties and heard oral argument, the co urt grants the motion and adopts the

25 following Order.

26 I. B A C K GROUND

27 Plaintiff JANE D.M. DOE (“Plaintiff”) “was born on April 11, 2008 and is a minor (“SAC”) ¶ 5.) “Plaintiff is the natural born daughter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.