Jane D.M. Doe v. County of Los Angeles
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE D.M. DOE, a minor, by and ) Case No. 20-cv-3218 DDP (JPRx) 10 through her Guardian ad Litem, Ivette ) 11 Rodriguez, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 12 ) MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND Plaintiff, ) AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR 13 ) DAMAGES 14 v. ) ) [Dkt. 37] 15 )
16 ) ) 17 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and ) 18 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) 19 Defendants. ) 20 ) ) 21
22 Presently before the court is County of Los Angeles’ Motion to Dismiss Second
23 Amended Complaint for Damages. (Dkt. 37, Mot.) Having considered the submissions
24 of the parties and heard oral argument, the co urt grants the motion and adopts the
25 following Order.
26 I. B A C K GROUND
27 Plaintiff JANE D.M. DOE (“Plaintiff”) “was born on April 11, 2008 and is a minor (“SAC”) ¶ 5.) “Plaintiff is the natural born daughter…