Luis Fermin Herrera v. T. Jusino

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 LUIS FERMIN HERRERA, SR., CASE NO. CV 20-11474-SB(AS) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 13 v. CONCLUSIONS AND 14 Warden T. JUSINO, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED 15 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16

17

18 19

20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 21 Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and 22 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made 23 a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and 24 Recommendation to which objections were directed,1 the Court 25

26 1 The Court notes that Petitioner’s reliance on Blumling v. United States, 2020 WL 5984395, at *4-*5 (N.D. Ohio, June 18, 27 2020), to support his claim that he did not need to exhaust administrative remedies since he requested relief from the Bureau 28 1 |} concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the 2 || Magistrate …