Kay Nee v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-04741California3,890 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAY N.,1 Case No. 2:20-cv-04741-MAA 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

13 v. ORDER REVERSING DECISION OF

THE COMMISSIONER AND

14

REMANDING FOR FURTHER

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

15 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On May 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social 20 Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for a period of 21 disability and disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security 22 Act. This matter is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons discussed 23 below, the Commissioner’s final decision is reversed, and this matter is remanded 24 for further administrative proceedings. 25 ///

26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 27 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.