Magnum Property Investments, LLC v. Anna Karapetian

1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

? Magnum Property Investments, LLC, CASE NUMBER: 10 11 2:21-cv-03542-MCS-KS Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || Anna Karapetian et al,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 |/ Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 | removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 ||…