Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20212:17-cv-07223California6,516 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES Case No.: 2:17-cv-07223-JWH(ASx) 5 DISTRICT COUNCIL 82 HEALTH CARE FUND, a third-party healthcare payor fund, 6 ANNIE M. SNYDER, a California consumer, RICKEY D. ROSE, a Missouri 7 consumer, JOHN CARDARELLI, a New AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 Jersey consumer, MARLYON K. 8 BUCKNER, a Florida consumer, and SYLVIE BIGORD, a Massachusetts 9 consumer, on behalf of themselves and ALL others similarly situated, 10

11 Plaintiffs,

12 vs.

13 TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, a Japanese 14 corporation; TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, Inc., an 15 Illinois corporation (fka TAKEDA

PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH

16 AMERICA, Inc.); and ELI LILLY & COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 24 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.