Kimberly Banks v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20212:20-cv-06208California4,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KIMBERLY BANKS and CAROL ) Case No. 20-cv-6208 DDP (RAOx) 12 CANTWELL, on behalf of themselves ) and all others similarly situated, ) ORDER DENYING IN PART, ) GRANTING IN PART, Plaintiffs, ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ) DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED v. ) COMPLAINT ) R.C. BIGELOW, INC., a corporation; and ) [Dkt. 12] DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. )

Presently before the court is Defendan t’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended C omplaint, or in the alternative, Motion to Str ike First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 12.)

H a v i n g c o n s i d e r e d the parties’ submissions a nd heard oral argument, the court grants the motion in part, denies in part, and adopts the following Order.

I. BACKGROUND P laintiffs Kimberly Banks and Carol Cantwell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this p u t a t i v …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.