Wendell Ray Thomas v. Laura Eldrige

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:20-cv-02982California237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WENDELL RAY THOMAS, Case No. CV 20-2982-DSF (PD)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

v.

AMENDED REPORT AND

ADOPTING, FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

LAURA ELDRIGE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF Respondent. UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

19 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 21 records on file, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States 22 Magistrate Judge (“Amended Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that 23 Amended Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 24 portions of the Amended Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court 25 accepts the Amended Report and adopts it as its own findings and 26 conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 27 Further, for the reasons stated in the Amended Report and 28 |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.