Wendell Ray Thomas v. Laura Eldrige
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:20-cv-02982California237 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WENDELL RAY THOMAS, Case No. CV 20-2982-DSF (PD)
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING
v.
AMENDED REPORT AND
ADOPTING, FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
LAURA ELDRIGE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF Respondent. UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
19 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 21 records on file, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States 22 Magistrate Judge (“Amended Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that 23 Amended Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 24 portions of the Amended Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court 25 accepts the Amended Report and adopts it as its own findings and 26 conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 27 Further, for the reasons stated in the Amended Report and 28 |…