Wendell Ray Thomas v. Laura Eldrige

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WENDELL RAY THOMAS, Case No. CV 20-2982-DSF (PD)

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

13 v.

AMENDED REPORT AND

14 ADOPTING, FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

15 LAURA ELDRIGE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF 16 Respondent. UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

17 DENYING CERTIFICATE OF 18 APPEALABILITY

19 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 21 records on file, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States 22 Magistrate Judge (“Amended Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that 23 Amended Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 24 portions of the Amended Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court 25 accepts the Amended Report and adopts it as its own findings and 26 conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 27 Further, for the reasons stated in the Amended Report and 28 1 |…