Serop J. Beylerian v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:20-cv-11580California2,627 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

JS-6

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 SEROP J. BEYLERIAN and AVEDIS Case № 2:20-CV-11580-ODW (RAOx) SHANLIAN, on behalf of themselves and 12 others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

13 Plaintiffs,

REMAND [15] AND

14 v. DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 15 [27], MOTION TO STRIKE [28],

HILLSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP,

INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES AND MOTION FOR RELIEF [38] 16 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiffs Serop J. Beylerian and Avedis Shanlian initiated this putative class 21 action in state court against Defendant Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc. (“Hillstone”). 22 (Notice of Removal (“Notice”) Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) Hillstone removed the 23 action based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. (Notice ¶ 3.) Plaintiffs now move to 24 remand on the grounds that Hillstone has not met its burden to establish an amount in 25 controversy exceeding $75,000. (Mot. to Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 26 No. 15.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.